Discover uContact Gamification tool - Top alternatives, customer information and buyer intent data. Compare uContact with the biggest competitors in the Gamification market like CRM.me Classcraft etc.
Find customers using uContact. Additionally, find customers with upcoming contract renewals and propensity to buy similar technologies.
Discover competitors of uContact to find prospects, market share, technology movements, buying patterns and compare technologies against each other.
Look up customers for uContact using Employee Count. Know their target company size to create targeted sales and marketing campaigns.
Understand primary industries that uContact sells to and new
industries they are tapping into
Find customers using uContact by region, country, state,
city and pin codes.
uContact’s Top competitors in the gamification category are CRM.me Classcraft Picnic. You can view a full list of uContact competitors here. Slintel uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of uContact and 40,000 other technologies on the internet.You can also compare uContact and its feature with top competitors here : uContact vs CRM.me uContact vs Classcraft uContact vs Picnic .
Majority of uContact’s customers for the gamification category fall in the company size of 1-10 employees (2 companies) 11-50 employees (1 companies) 201-500 employees (1 companies) . You can view a distribution chart of uContact customers by company size here.
uContact has market share of 1.36% in gamification market. uContact competes with 23 competitor tools in gamification category. Top alternatives for uContact gamification tool are CRM.me with 25.00% Classcraft with 21.59% Picnic with 10.68% market share.
Around the world in 2021, over 5 companies have started using uContact as gamification tool. Companies using uContact for gamification are majorly from Spain with 2 customers. 33.33% of uContact customers are from the Spain. Other top countries using uContact are Argentina Canada with 1(16.67%) 1(16.67%) customers respectively.